Background Image
Previous Page  83 / 89 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 83 / 89 Next Page
Page Background

83

Amouri A, Louzir H, Dellagi K, Abdeladhim AB. Blood

2008;111:1805-10.

45.

Regelink JC, van Roessel CH, van Galen KP,

Ossenkoppele GJ, Huijgens PC, Zweegman S. Long-term

follow-up of tandem autologous stem-cell transplantation

in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:e741-3.

46.

Björkstrand BB, Ljungman P, Svensson H, Hermans J,

Alegre A, Apperley J, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow

transplantation

versus

autologous

stem

cell

transplantation in multiple myeloma: a retrospective case-

matched study from the European Group for Blood and

Marrow Transplantation Blood 1996;88:4711-8.

47.

Khaled Y, Mellacheruvu S, Reddy P, Peres E, Mineishi S.

Long-term outcomes following myeloablative allogeneic

transplantation for multiple myeloma compared to

autologous transplantation and the impact of graft-

versus-myeloma effect. Bone Marrow Transplant

2009;44:325-6.

48.

Rosiñol L, Pérez-Simón JA, Sureda A, de la Rubia J, de

Arriba F, Lahuerta JJ, et al. A prospective PETHEMA

study of tandem autologous transplantation versus

autograft followed by reduced-intensity conditioning

allogeneic transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple

myeloma. Blood 2008;112:3591-3.

49.

Björkstrand B, Iacobelli S, Hegenbart U, Gruber A,

Greinix H, Volin L, et al. Tandem autologous/reduced-

intensity conditioning allogeneic stem-cell transplantation

versus autologous transplantation in myeloma: long-term

follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3016-22.

50.

Alegre A, Tomás JF, Martínez-Chamorro C, Gil-

Fernández JJ, Fernández-Villalta MJ, Arranz R, et al.

Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell

mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-